dhcpcd-discuss

Thanks Roy!

Found a note regarding this on
https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/openspecs/windows_protocols/ms-dhcpe/fe8a2dd4-1e8c-4546-bacd-4ae10de02058

Was not super clear though,
"The use of this alternate format is indicated by the presence of a Vendor
Class Identifier Option".
Actually I'm sending both vendor/user class as of now... But I don't have
access to a Microsoft dhcp-server my self to test. I'll see if I can set up
something. It's not a to big change to implement msuserclass?

//Jonas


Den fre 14 feb. 2020 12:28Roy Marples <roy@xxxxxxxxxxxx> skrev:

> Hi Jonas
>
> On 13/02/2020 15:09, Jonas Ramstrand wrote:
> > Hi!
> > I'm using the userclass option, but I understand that it exists two
> formats for
> > this. Seems like the Microsoft way is to skip the "UC_Len_i". Do you
> know if
> > there is a way to get around this, to use dhcpcd and Microsoft
> dhcp-server?
>
> dhcpcd is fully standards compliant for RFC3004.
> There is nothing in the RFC that allows UC_Len_i to be skipped.
>
> So, short answer is No.
>
> Saying that, we could add a new option to dhcpcd called msuserclass which
> allows
> this unholyness.
>
> Roy
>