dhcpcd-discuss

Thanks Roy,
Let me test and get back to you.

Thanks,
Shweta

On Mon, 16 Dec 2019, 22:37 Roy Marples, <roy@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> On 16/12/2019 12:40, Roy Marples wrote:
> > On 12/12/2019 14:21, Roy Marples wrote:
> >> On 12/12/2019 12:51, Shweta Kalyani wrote:
> >>> Thanks for the reply Roy (been waiting on it :))
> >>> My code is based on 7.2.3 so it will be difficult for me to test it
> >>> for dhcpcd-8* versions. I understand and appreciate your support for
> >>> this.
> >>> If you send patches, I can test it and get back to you.
> >>
> >> First patch is here:
> >>
> https://roy.marples.name/cgit/dhcpcd.git/commit/?h=dhcpcd-7&id=b8233dd55cdf53084a4a2ccdecf784d18c001a30
> >
> >
> > Second patch is here:
> >
> https://roy.marples.name/cgit/dhcpcd.git/commit/?h=dhcpcd-7&id=cf8ed7e230e2d4a7add95796c3f8730cd0d9a09c
>
> Third patch is here:
>
> https://roy.marples.name/cgit/dhcpcd.git/commit/?h=dhcpcd-7&id=13a4ee71416a2a2ac7f4a1d146c2c0ca7bc10c65
>
> Basically there was an issue removing the deprecated address from a
> special collection using the wrong member which got to other parts of
> dhcpcd getting confused and just not adding any more delegations at this
> point.
>
> If you can confirm that this fixes your issue I'll make new releases of
> -7 and -8.
>
> Roy
>