dhcpcd-discuss

Re: [RFC]Routes are stored as a linked list

Roy Marples

Tue Mar 05 09:20:31 2019

On 05/03/2019 07:03, Roy Marples wrote:
If you run dhcpcd under valgrind, is there a large difference between the number of mallocs made?

I also added a small patch to report the number of times a route was placed onto the free list and the number of times a new route was taken from it.

Could you report those numbers please? I'm surprised that memory usage is low, infact no different, with it enabled still compared to without. I'm now starding to wonder if this micro memory optimisation is worth it with modern allocators.

Roy

Follow-Ups:
Re: [RFC]Routes are stored as a linked listDonald Sharp
References:
[RFC]Routes are stored as a linked listDonald Sharp
Re: [RFC]Routes are stored as a linked listRoy Marples
Re: [RFC]Routes are stored as a linked listDonald Sharp
Re: [RFC]Routes are stored as a linked listRoy Marples
Re: [RFC]Routes are stored as a linked listDonald Sharp
Re: [RFC]Routes are stored as a linked listDonald Sharp
Re: [RFC]Routes are stored as a linked listDonald Sharp
Re: [RFC]Routes are stored as a linked listRoy Marples
Re: [RFC]Routes are stored as a linked listDonald Sharp
Re: [RFC]Routes are stored as a linked listRoy Marples
Re: [RFC]Routes are stored as a linked listDonald Sharp
Re: [RFC]Routes are stored as a linked listRoy Marples
Re: [RFC]Routes are stored as a linked listRoy Marples
Re: [RFC]Routes are stored as a linked listDonald Sharp
Re: [RFC]Routes are stored as a linked listDonald Sharp
Re: [RFC]Routes are stored as a linked listRoy Marples
Archive administrator: postmaster@marples.name