Re: Dhcpcd 6.11.5 - did not receive 2 announcements after 3 unanswered probes (as RFC 5227)
Stefano Cappa
Sun Jan 13 01:59:58 2019
Thank u for the interest about this topic.
As suggested I removed the include rows and now I'm able to build also
version 7.0.8.
However to simply porting also to other OS it could be better to use a
standard tool. This is only a suggestion. I don't know the reason behind
your choice.
Thank u.
Il ven 11 gen 2019, 18:48 Roy Marples <roy@xxxxxxxxxxxx> ha scritto:
> On 11/01/2019 14:37, Joakim Tjernlund wrote:
> >> Or we can stop adding so many knobs and just use CFLAGS?
> >> Example Makefile directive - no idea how to do this in bitbake.
> >> CFLAGS+= --sysroot=/x/y/x
> >
> > That won't work for true autotools systems, other parts needs it
> too(like libtool)
> > In you case it could work, if you use gcc to link. Otherwise you need to
> > pass it to LDFLAGS as well.
>
> This is not autotools, libtool or anything else.
> It "pretends" to be GNU configure just for ease of use in most packaging
> systems.
>
> The *sole* requirements to build dhcpcd are:
> POSIX shell and userland for configure
> Makefile compliant build program to build it
> C-99 compiler
>
> Heck, older verions of dhcpcd *just* had a Makefile without any
> configure and cross compiled just fine.
>
> Luckily, the Makefile supports both CFLAGS and LDFLAGS for this, which I
> would expect to work with pretty much every build system.
> In this exact case though, dhcpcd is linked with $CC (which may or may
> not be gcc)
>
> Rpy
>
Archive administrator: postmaster@marples.name