dhcpcd-discuss

Hi Mattie, sorry for the late reply

On 23/04/2018 17:43, Mattieu Baptiste wrote:
> Yes, you're right. It doesn't make a difference.
> Now, I can't see a reason why the server doesn't reply...
> The three important options my ISP requires are precisely the same
> between a request sent by the official modem and a request sent by
> dhcpcd.
> There are minor differences on other options, but I don't see what
> would be the reason it fails.
> What comes to mind...
> - with dibbler, we need to set the "auth" option twice; otherwise it
> doesn't work. Maybe the server doesn't like the options order in the
> packet?
> - the official modem and dibbler both requests the "auth" option in
> the "option request" option, whereas dhcpcd don't. Maybe I need to
> send that?
> I'm a bit desperate on what's the problem of my ISP's crappy DHCP server...

The attached patch should work.
I'm not in a position to test it yet, maybe you could?

The option order should not matter.

Roy

diff --git a/src/dhcp6.c b/src/dhcp6.c
index 6e470a98..a6e2bbd8 100644
--- a/src/dhcp6.c
+++ b/src/dhcp6.c
@@ -3705,6 +3705,8 @@ dhcp6_start1(void *arg)
 		if (ifo->fqdn != FQDN_DISABLE ||
 		    ifo->options & DHCPCD_HOSTNAME)
 			add_option_mask(ifo->requestmask6, D6_OPTION_FQDN);
+		if (ifo->auth.options & DHCPCD_AUTH_SENDREQUIRE)
+			add_option_mask(ifo->requestmask6, D6_OPTION_AUTH);
 	}
 
 #ifndef SMALL