dhcpcd-discuss

On 22/04/17 06:05, Harald Dunkel wrote:
> On 04/21/17 20:47, Roy Marples wrote:
>> On 21/04/2017 19:24, Harald Dunkel wrote:
>>> IMHO DT violates rfc 3633: "During renumbering it is expected
>>> that the old and the new prefix co-exist for some time." Maybe
>>> the rfc is too vague here.
> 
>> The RFC is fine, and strictly speaking so is DT because it does
>> co-exist, it's just not managed by DHCPv6 any longer.
> 
> 
> I had assumed this "co-exist" implies a working route for the old 
> prefix.

That's a fair point and you should probably take that up with DT.

Roy

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature