dhcpcd-discuss

Re: ipv6 default gw

Bernd May

Sat May 07 09:05:34 2016

Hi,

On 06.05.2016 18:30, Roy Marples wrote:
> But why would you want to do this anyway?

I though that maybe Matej wanted to use both uplinks in paralell,
depending on the chosen source prefix. I think in multi-access networks
this might be useful, if you want to explicitly use, e.g. your LTE uplink.

I use this setup rather extensively while working on a network layer
socket prototype that should automagically choose the source prefix
based on further preferences like network router bandwidth or RTT to a
given target. That way it might be possible for an application to use an
uplink based on application preferences for a network, e.g. a streaming
client or a VOIP app.
Using source policy routing allows me to manage one routing table per
announced prefix and have a default gateway per prefix.

RDNSS and DNSSL are still a little problem though, because resolvconf
only uses the top three nameservers reported from all interfaces. Maybe
adding prefix information via a hook script will help me on that.

regards,

-- 
Bernd May

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature


Follow-Ups:
Re: ipv6 default gwRoy Marples
References:
ipv6 default gwMatěj Grégr
Re: ipv6 default gwBernd May
Re: ipv6 default gwRoy Marples
Archive administrator: postmaster@marples.name