Re: Building without epoll - configure fails
Shahid Mahmood
Thu Mar 24 12:37:29 2016
Sure, I guess:
Linux (none) 3.12.44-rt61-XXXXXXX+ #1 PREEMPT Fri Feb 26 06:39:04 EST 2016
armv5tejl GNU/Linux
(masked internal board name/version).
Let me dig into the SDK to see what it is seeing...
Thanks.
On Thu, Mar 24, 2016 at 8:11 AM, Roy Marples <roy@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On 24/03/2016 12:07, Shahid Mahmood wrote:
> > Yes, that would be my next step. The SDK reports (incorrectly) at build
> > time that epoll is present, whereas it not.
> > Thanks for the tip!
>
> Ok good.
> I don't suppose you can post uname -a outout or tell any distingushing
> #defines the SDK/device has as well so I can avoid epoll in eloop for it
> in configure by default?
>
> Thanks
>
> Roy
>
Archive administrator: postmaster@marples.name