Re: Building without epoll - configure fails
Roy Marples
Thu Mar 24 12:11:23 2016
On 24/03/2016 12:07, Shahid Mahmood wrote:
> Yes, that would be my next step. The SDK reports (incorrectly) at build
> time that epoll is present, whereas it not.
> Thanks for the tip!
Ok good.
I don't suppose you can post uname -a outout or tell any distingushing
#defines the SDK/device has as well so I can avoid epoll in eloop for it
in configure by default?
Thanks
Roy
Archive administrator: postmaster@marples.name