dhcpcd-discuss

Re: IPV6 IA_PD multiple prefixes and SLA 0

Roy Marples

Thu Jul 09 09:29:16 2015

Hi Ron

On 05/07/2015 18:09, Ron Angeles wrote:
> Thanks for your comments and confirming that a /62 is really the way to
> go. That excerpt from RFC3633 really shed some light for me. I think
> your man pages properly document the requirements regarding SLA 0. There
> are two things about me that probably lead me to ignore the
> documentation: 1) I heavily rely on example to learn (and honestly an
> example of multi-interface delegation is pretty sparse on the internet),
> and 2) I have a firm grasp on subnetting, which lead me to be convinced
> that a /63 could be leveraged into two /64s.
> 
> My only suggestion is to provide an example of a multi-interface config
> in manpages.

Addressed here:
http://roy.marples.name/projects/dhcpcd/ci/c253b0a815458c37?sbs=0

Roy

References:
IPV6 IA_PD multiple prefixes and SLA 0Ron Angeles
Re: IPV6 IA_PD multiple prefixes and SLA 0Roy Marples
Re: IPV6 IA_PD multiple prefixes and SLA 0Ron Angeles
Archive administrator: postmaster@marples.name