dhcpcd-discuss

Re: Multihoming support in dhcpcd (source-dest routing)

Baptiste Jonglez

Thu Mar 26 13:22:16 2015

Hi Roy,

Sorry about the long delay.

On Sat, Mar 07, 2015 at 01:16:33AM +0000, Roy Marples wrote:
> > What do you think of the patch itself?  It may be a bit too intrusive,
> > because it changes the rt6 structure, but it looks like the simplest way
> > to add a source network prefix to a route.
> 
> I see no problem with it.
> As I said earlier, I was making a lot of changes to how routing is handled 
> within dhcpcd. This has now been done and here's a patch against the latest 
> code in fossil. I've #ifdef'ed everything as it only applies in the Linux case 
> and it seems it needs the IPV6_MULTIPLE_TABLES kernel option enabled (wasn't 
> on in my kernel) so I've turned it into an option in dhcpcd.conf(5).
> 
> How does this look? Does it work for you?

Thanks a lot for adapting and improving the patch!

It looks good at first glance, I'll probably test it next week.

Baptiste

Attachment: pgpzt0VelsP2e.pgp
Description: PGP signature


References:
Multihoming support in dhcpcd (source-dest routing)Baptiste Jonglez
Re: Multihoming support in dhcpcd (source-dest routing)Roy Marples
Re: Multihoming support in dhcpcd (source-dest routing)Baptiste Jonglez
Re: Multihoming support in dhcpcd (source-dest routing)Roy Marples
Archive administrator: postmaster@marples.name