dhcpcd-discuss

Re: timeout behavior different with dhcpcd 6.6.1

Amit Uttamchandani

Thu Nov 13 15:55:19 2014

On Thu, Nov 13, 2014 at 03:50:41PM +0000, Roy Marples wrote:
> > Thanks Roy. Unfortunately, we use the IPv4LL functionality. But it's ok,
> > I will wait for your fix.
> 
> OK, fair enough.
> Tell me though, when the IPv4LL address was assigned with timeout 0, did
> it get a lease assigned to the interface shortly afterwards?
> 

No, the address offered by the dhcp server was never assigned. The
interesting thing is, I think it took the IPv4LL address as the lease.
This is because when I took a hex dump of
/var/lib/dhcpcd5/dhcpcd-eth0.lease, the address in there is the IPv4LL
lease.

Follow-Ups:
Re: timeout behavior different with dhcpcd 6.6.1Roy Marples
References:
timeout behavior different with dhcpcd 6.6.1Amit Uttamchandani
Re: timeout behavior different with dhcpcd 6.6.1Roy Marples
Re: timeout behavior different with dhcpcd 6.6.1Amit Uttamchandani
Re: timeout behavior different with dhcpcd 6.6.1Roy Marples
Archive administrator: postmaster@marples.name