Re: IPV4LL and EXPIRE
Roy Marples
Wed Oct 22 15:07:54 2014
Hi David
On 22/10/2014 16:01, David Hauck wrote:
> I wonder if this behaviour should be configurable?
No.
I actually had a better idea and am working on making a better ARP state
engine, so we can have two, one for DHCP and one for IPv4LL.
This should allow dhcpcd to negotiate DHCP and IPv4LL at the same time.
> Also, I haven't considered IPv6 in this discussion - I have no idea whether any of this behaviour translates.
It doesn't.
IPv6 requires the LL address up and running as it uses that for RS/RA
and DHCPv6.
> Finally, can I assume you'll wrap this round of IPV4LL changes into a new release once you've completed your testing?
Hopefully have it wrapped by over the weekend or earlier.
> And, of course, thanks for helping to work through all of this with me.
No problem!
Roy
Archive administrator: postmaster@marples.name