dhcpcd-discuss

On 2014-10-18 01:16, Roy Marples wrote:
> So that's the reason maybe? Defending the IPv4LL address triggered an 
> expiry?
> I may have to setup a reverse ARP proxy to test this.

Fixed here:
http://roy.marples.name/projects/dhcpcd/ci/77cc5e6fefbda2e0d03790a2cd1447df385c2d18?sbs=0

Hopefully that fixes the state engine, can you test it please? :)

So the last question is how do we handle the ARP table?
From your earlier statements, it looks like you run dhcpcd per interface 
rather than once dhcpcd process for all interfaces. Is this true?
Also, what kernel are you running? I thought that deleting the IP 
address would clear the ARP entry for it? If this is the case, how did 
the table fill up unless IPv4LL from other machines?

Hopefully you can clarify all the above!

Thanks

Roy