Re: Router using non-/64 prefix delegation (ia_pd) needs a normal address (ia_na) to route packets.
Roy Marples
Thu Jul 17 23:43:17 2014
On 2014-07-18 00:20, Robert White wrote:
On 07/17/2014 02:47 PM, Roy Marples wrote:
Btw why are you using the ia_pd_mix flag? I thought that didn't work
for
Comcast?
Uh, Comcast never responded to me but they seem to have quietly fixed
their shit.
I put a "polite screed" on their forums a couple of weeks back that
discussed the RFC and pointed them to this mailing list.
http://forums.comcast.com/t5/Home-Networking-Router-WiFi/IPv6-DHCPv6-ia-na-and-ia-pd-REPLYs-from-separate-servers/td-p/2218954
The tcpdump I just performed on a restart of dhcpcd shows the
RFC-ishly correct single packet response instead of the previous
multi-packet nonsense.
So, while a direct response would have been nice, the proper function
is a happy enough outcome for me.
This now works with ia_pd_mix. But I now have no way to test the port
alias code.
/sigh 8-)
Heh, fair enough.
Could you at least test dhcpcd fully works with Comcast *without* that
option please?
Other ISPs could behave the same way and I'd like to know if this works
or not :)
Thanks!
Roy
Archive administrator: postmaster@marples.name